European History Essay Paper †Past Question Plans Essay

This is an explain type question so its asking you to do just that, hardly also a little more. Merely describing the measures Ferdinand and Isabella took to fuck with various chores will get some marks, l unrivaledsome(prenominal) more marks will be gained if you number up the outcomes of these policies, and register how successful they were. For good example, you whitethorn verbalize in the es express that Ferdinand and Isabella faced economic problems, and you may go on to explain what policy(ies) they introduced to solve the problem. This would be explaining how they dealt with the problem, just you can go further and scan how well they dealt with it compargond to new(prenominal) issues, etc. Also, refer to historians and what they verbalise somewhat how they dealt with problems. Always link back to the question.So you musta) Show what the problems wereb) What measures they took to deal with themc) How successful these measures were, evaluating against separate iss ues, historiographical interpretations, short-term/long-term instances.The evidencePARA 1 WHAT WERE THE PROBLEMSi) Civil War in Aragon diminish of Barcelona, polite disorder, social unrest.ii) omit of Grandee support for Isabella.iii) Lack of town support for Isabella.iv) Fo control menaces.v) Religious issues Jews, Muslims, Reconquista.PARA 2 HOW THEY DEALT WITH THEMi) Civil War in Aragon well, indexiness lav of Aragon was very much in favour of a spousal entirelyiance of Ferdinand with Isabella. John saw this as a way of engineering territorial tri only whene in area like Catalonia, keeping the French at bay. He also saw the accident of give out economic ties that would help halt the decline of Barcelona and peasant unrest. Thus, Chroniclers depicted Ferdinand King in January 1479 as the founder of a new Age, a messiah. The real problems in Aragon, however, like that of town defend over financial policy, were not even attempt to be sorted out until subseque ntlywards 1479 when Ferdinand had been King for a few years. However, between 1469 and 1479, we can take on the ideal behind Johns scheme to marry Ferdinand and Isabella, as it was meant to give Ferdinand a better chance to reviving Aragons fortunes something, in the long-term, which easy starts to happen, for example with the emergence of town consulados, etc.ii) Lack of Grandee support for Isabella Isabella had some Grandee support but she inf solelyible more in order to win her ecological succession. The succession crisis was the biggest issue, and within that, the lack of Grandee support an of the essence(predicate) problem that required to be addressed. So, she had to put on deals to get support. She needed their support as Grandees had land, money, power and men they could make or break a monarch. So, she bought them off central Mendoza was promised a Chancellorship, his brformer(a) was created Duke of Infantado Enriquez was make Admiral of Castile Velasco made Co nstable of Castile. Isabella said support me and Ill avenge you, and this is how she changed the potentially dangerous situation of only a minority of Nobles supporting her, to a studyity in favour of her.iii) Lack of town support most towns were in farm ones stomach m some(prenominal) bandos fought for their own subdue of the towns and cities, depriving Ferdinand and Isabella of an important power base. Isabella used a manakin of techniques to overcome the problem, demonstrating her political aptitude and ability to call on out different answers to varying situations. Thus, Burgos was promised Royal rampart from liberty-threatening nobles after Burgoss citizens highlighted this as a major hindrance in their supporting of Isabella. Toledo was offered extensive privileges if they submitted Seville was exist with financial and commercial-grade penalties if Isabellas right as Queen was refused in that respect. Rodrigo declared in favour of Isabella-How important was theolo gy in influencing the policies of Ferdinand and Isabella?The only way to revoke fib is to structure an essay properly and to direction on explaining and arguing, quite than tell aparting the story. It takes a authorized amount of courage to accept, but a shorter, focused, analytical answer is much better than a long, narrative one If you can, use short, snappy quotations to support your analysis, rather than long factual descriptions.Clearly you understand that religion was important and since this is the factor given in the essay title, you need to deal with this in the greatest depth. A brief introduction stressing the piety of Ferdinand and (especially) Isabella (eg ref the Catholic monarchs, the fact that their tomb in Granada Cathedral records only their achievements in religion) should be an followed by an explanation of how the achievement of Granada, the establishment of sacred unanimity, the amend of the Spanish church and even the sponsorship of Columbus were mo tivated by apparitional aims.In the setting of this essay, the policy of spiritual uniformity requires token attention, as the implementation of this policy was politically difficult (eg opposition to the Inquisition, especially in the Aragonese kingdoms and the revolt of the Alpujarras) and economically damaging (eg the loss of the wealth and commercial skills of the Jewish comm building blocky especially in Barcelona and the hoo-ha to trade and agriculture in Granada after the prominence of the Moors). It therefore shows the importance of religion in the physical composition and implementation of policy, given that Ferdinand & Isabella were willing to accept the upshot political and economic difficulties.However, to give your essay counterweight you will need also to explain that these religious policies had other aims too, given the pressing need to reconstruct and strengthen royal position (particularly in Castile, after the anarchy of Henry IVs reign and the civil wa r). In particular, the seduction of Granada and the sponsorship of Columbus were motivated by economic aims, dapple the conquest and reform of the Church also had broader political aims (eg the conquest get together the nobility behind the new regime and gave it a safe outlet for its aggressive instincts, while ecclesiastic reform went some way to establishing royal authority over the Spanish Church).You should conclude that this complex of motives religious, political and economic was inevitable, given the personality of the Catholic monarchs and the context of their reign.I hope all this helps you with your studies. equitable spate-How United was Spain by 1516?The main thing with any essay is to be clear in your consciousness about what you are going to say. Yes, there are different interpretations but the only presage of earn your exam marker is really interested in is yours So you must decide right from the root word what you think the answer is and structure your es say accordingly. If you commence time, you can include some discussion of the other views/possibilities in your conclusionIn the case of this essay, there are a number of possible answers ie Ferdinand & Isabella united Spain more or less in all they didnt unite it at all or they united it in some ways but not others. Common sense will tell you that the last approach is probably the best oneHaving decided what your parentage is going to be, you can say so in your introduction (ie Ferdinand & Isabella imposed religious uniformity on Spain and created a dynastic coalescence however measure designed to bring about closer economic ties were half-hearted at best and they never united Spain politically) and structure the rest of the essay accordingly. go off by explaining those areas where unity was achieved, in particular the implementation of policies designed to bring about religious uniformity (conquest of Granada, expulsion of Jews and Moors, Inquisition) and the dynastic union r esulting from the marriage of Ferdinand & Isabella that also enabled the Catholic Kings to pursue commonalty host and foreign policy aims.However, you should be aware that all of this only went so far. For example, the supposedly Spanish conquest of Granada actually resulted in the expansion of the crown of Castile, while toleration of Moorish practices actually continued in Aragon (especially Valencia). Perhaps most telling was the fact that after Isabellas remnant, Ferdinand re-married in order to prevent (unsuccessfully) Charles of Burgundy from acquire Aragon as well as Castile. In other words, Ferdinand did not want the dynastic union created by himself and Isabella to last if it meant that their joint heir would be a Habsburg prince.Consider the economy next unity is suggested by the equalisation of currencies (often referred to as the introduction of a common currency) and the introduction of a rudimentary postal service. However, interior customs barriers and regulation s protecting the privileged status of endemic merchants in towns like Barcelona, Valencia and Seville remained.Finally, explain that Ferdinand & Isabella certainly didnt unite Spain in any political sense. Indeed, they probably had no intention of ever doing so (for example they never called themselves the King and Queen of Spain). The component kingdoms all had their own rights and privileges that made it almost impossible to command as a single political unit . Indeed, given the potential strength of the crown in Castile (and the weakness of royal authority in Aragon) Ferdinand & Isabella sagely concentrated on restoring the authority of the crown there, release Aragon more or less to its own devices. apart from the Inquisition, there were no common political, administrative, legal or military institutions and the rights of the Aragonese kingdoms, Navarre and the Basque Provinces were fully respected (apart from the imposition of the Inquisition). answer this section of your essay by referring to events after Isabellas death, when Ferdinand was seen as a foreign ruler with no rights in Castile and was consequently excluded from the government of the country. It was only the death of Archduke Philip and the madness of Joanna that forced the Castilian administration under Cisneros to turn (very reluctantly) to Ferdinand for assistance.As noted above, your conclusion might include discussion of other interpretations/points of view but it is better if you end up reinforcing your own argument If you can, find a snappy quotation that supports your point of view to end withI hope this hopes you with your studies. Good luck